1.00 The simplest thing
a body can say of itself
that is if it speaks, is either
"I am it" or "I am not it"
and "I have it" or
"I don't have it"

1.01 These most primitive
statements about the self
when combined within
any speaking subject
generate 4 fundamental
states of mind

1.02 These 4 modes
of thought can be
designated as follows:

1 The atmoi mode
The subject considers
themselves
"to be it but
not to have it"

2 The jivat mode
The subject considers
themselves
"not to be it but
but to have it"

3 The jivatmoi mode
The subject considers
themselves
"to to be it
" and have it"

4 The anatmoi mode
The subject considers
themselves
"not to be it and
not to have it"

2.00 All known speaking
subjects are sexually
embodied with an inbuilt
biological imperative
to be Looked at
at times

2.01 An 8-fold typology
of the mind of all speaking
subjects is generated when
the presence or absence
of this in-built desire
to be looked at is
combined with the
above 4 modes

3.00 For all individual
speaking subjects their
character mU-biogram
can be defined as that
which represents one
of these eight
fundamental
modes

3.01 From a psychological
point of view there are two
types of mU-biogram
the extrovert that wants
to draw you towards them
and the introvert that
wants to blow you away

3.02 These 8 mU-biograms
represent the following
modes of existence

(0) The b-anatmoi mode
Don't look at me
I am not it and
I don't have it

(1) The d-anatmoi mode
Look at me
I am not it and
I don't have it

(2) The b-atmoi mode
Don't look at me
I am it but
I don't have it

(3) The d-atmoi mode
Look at me
I am it but
I don't have it

(4) The b- jivat mode
Don't look at me
I am not it but
I have it

(5) The d-jivat mode
Look at me
I am not it but
I have it

(6) The b-jivatmoi mode
Don't look at me
I am it and
I have it

(7) The d-jivatmoi mode
Look at me
I am it and
I have it

4.00 All eight modes will be
found both within and without
the psychoanalytical encounter

4.01 Within any encounter these
modes will be exhibited through
the response of an individual
speaking subject to the
following two questions:

1 What sort of "me" are you?

A "Look at me"
or
"Don't look at me"

2 What sort of "I" are you?

"I am it"or "I am not it"

"I have it" or "I don't have it"

4.02 In answering the first
the subject has the option
of either assuming the
" d" or " b" position

4.03 In answering the second
the subject has the option
of either going for being
or not being it before having
or not having it or vice versa
depending upon the initial
response a re-iteration of
half of the second will
therefore be necessary to
establish which of the four
fundamental modes
is present

3 What about?
"I am it" or "I am not it"
or
What about?
"I have it" or "I don't have it"

4.04 In the re-iteration the order
of answering generates
a further four modes

4.05 These additional modes
can be designated as follows

1 The atmoi' mode
The subject considers themselves
" not to have it but to be it "

2 The jivat' mode
The subject considers themselves
"to have it but not to be it"

3 The jivatmoi' mode
The subject considers themselves
"to have it and to be it"

4 The anatmoi' mode
The subject considers themselves
"not to have it and not to be it"

4.06 Thus the original 8-fold typology
will convert empirically into a 16-fold
one. All sixteen modes will be
found both within and without
the psychoanalytical encounter

4.07 Not only will this 16-fold
typology be found naturally
within the speaking speech
of all analytical encounters
but it will also be inscribed
within the spoken speech
of all natural languages
A linguistic analysis of all
those terms that differentiate
individual differences amongst
speaking subjects will necessarily
reveal sixten basic domains of
differences within all
natural languages

5.00 At last the whole Freudian
project can now be brought
to a satisfactory scientific
closure assuming that any
individual's spoken mU-biogram
represents their ultimate limit
of development in infancy
and that their present-day
circumstances although
mirroring these infantile
experiences have had no
determining influence on
the actual biogram uttered

5.01 Consequently within the
psychoanalytical encounter it is
not only imperative to establish
what the subject of the speaking
speech is but also what type of
subject is doing the speaking

5.02 Ultimately it is the reigning
character mU-biogram of the
individual speaking subject
that constitutes their
fundamental mode
of existence

5.03 For all speaking subjects
their fundamental mode
of existence is reflected in
the contents of their actions
(spoken or otherwise) in their
dreams and even in the choice
of cultural products with which
they surround themselves

5.04 Indeed the differing surface
manifestations of the ways of life
of all individual speaking subjects
can be seen to be ultimately
determined by the dominant
mU-biogram of each
individual subject

6.00 In consequence
the differing surface
manifestations of all
cultures and societies
must be seen to be
ultimately expressions
of the various character
types that triumph within
their respective social
and political arenas

6.01 Within any speaking
community there will
be a scatter of these
individual character
types that will be
unique to that
community

7.00 It ought never to
be forgotten though
that the simplest
thing a body can
say of any Other is
either "Look at
you" or "Don't
Look at you"
"You are it" or
"You are not it" &
"You have it" or
"You don't have it"
which generates
in turn a further
16-fold set of "U"
mU-biograms

7.01 From the point of
view of Logic all such
biogramatic positions
whether they be "mE"
or"U" orientated mirror each
Other perfectly in inverted forms

8.00 Indeed it is this set of mirroring
biogramatic modes that constitutes
that order the Phallocentric Order that
remains central to the structuring
of the minds of all known
Speaking Beings